Read this:
"It is a question asked repeatedly across America: why, in the aftermath of a financial mess that generated hundreds of billions in losses, have no high-profile participants in the disaster been prosecuted?"
Then read this:
"Does any living person actually think that Martha Stewart should have done time? Stewart avoided a loss of $45,000 by selling about 4,000 shares of stock in something known as ImClone Systems after receiving 'nonpublic' information. The government indicted Stewart on nine counts. Obstruction one of them. She was convicted of conspiracy, and obstruction of an agency proceeding."
Yes, I absolutely think Martha Stewart should have done time.
After mis-representing and mis-diagnosing Bonds / steroids / MLB in general, Lupica still believes he has the authority to write about Clemens's upcoming trial.
I think I can state with near certainty that Mike Lupica's columns are not the place to go for expertise on U.S. jurisprudence.
No comments:
Post a Comment