"For the last time:
Amphetamines were clearly performance enablers in baseball."
Why do I think this isn't the last time?
"But if they were performance enhancers, how come the record books never changed the way they did during the steroids era?"
Because they weren't as effective as steroids.
"If you want to vote for guys who juiced, have at it.
But you need more than greenies to help build your case for them.
A lot more."
Lupica is on a phony high horse. I don't speak for everyone who takes a more nuanced position, but that's generally the objection.
Cheater outrage is applied selectively. Mike Piazza, Ivan Rodriguez, Jeff Bagwell, Gaylord Perry and others are already in the Hall of Fame.
The reason I'm certain Mike Piazza took steroids is because I have a brain. Nobody before or since regularly hit 450-foot opposite field fly balls. Nobody drafted that low in the draft ever made the major leagues, much less regularly hit 450-foot opposite field fly balls.
The Guardians of the Game laid off Piazza because he's a nice guy who graciously granted post game interviews.
Luipca uses his column and his votes/influence to promote people who assist his career.
So when people call out the hypocrisy, his weak retort is that the cheaters of the 1970s weren't as good at cheating.
No comments:
Post a Comment