Only one football topic makes seems to make its way onto my baseball blog:
"If you had to choose, there's no doubt Peyton is still the better player. "
Right.
So what are you talking about, exactly?
"But since quarterbacks are ultimately judged by their Super Bowl rings, the score is 1-1."
If your brain is so infantile that you can only judge quarterbacks by their Super Bowl rings, you should consider drastic measures.
Maybe the Sunday sudoku.
'I think Eli did more to win the Super Bowl than his brother,' said one GM, referring to the entire playoff run. 'He did more for the Giants than Peyton did for the Colts given all the adversity that the Giants had to go through to get there. It was a cakewalk for the Colts. I don't think you could say enough about what Eli did.' "
It was a cakewalk for the Colts (against superior competition, I might add) largely because PEYTON MANNING IS SO GOOD.
Cakewalks are good.
Winning by a lot is good.
The adversity the Giants went through is largely because they have a quarterback who can't throw spirals.
No comments:
Post a Comment